Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert "Mute "ResizeObserver loop limit exceeded" exception (#2032)" #2044

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 10, 2022

Conversation

RasmusKjeldgaard
Copy link
Collaborator

This reverts commit 912e97b.

Which issue does this PR close?

This PR closes no issue, rather i reopens #2031

What is the new behavior?

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No

Are there any additional context?

Checklist:

The following tasks should be carried out in sequence in order to follow the process of contributing correctly.

Reminders

  • Make sure you have implemented tests following the guidelines in: "The good: Test".
  • Make sure you have updated the cookbook with examples and showcases (for bug fixes, enhancements & new components).

Review

  • Do a self-review.
  • Request that the changes are code-reviewed
  • Request that the changes are UX reviewed (only necessary if your PR introduces visual changes)

When the pull request has been approved it will be automatically merged to master via automerge.

Copy link
Collaborator

@jkaltoft jkaltoft left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Are you sure about main as base branch?

@RasmusKjeldgaard RasmusKjeldgaard changed the base branch from main to master February 10, 2022 09:37
@RasmusKjeldgaard RasmusKjeldgaard merged commit 2fa8204 into master Feb 10, 2022
@RasmusKjeldgaard RasmusKjeldgaard deleted the bug/revert-resizeobserver-fix branch February 10, 2022 09:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants