-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
README: update for new version #7
Conversation
Looks like this action runner is not using "long-running branches", which means that to use the latest version of this action runner, the usage instructions need to be updated. Alternatively, please consider having a `v1` tag which moves on every release within the `1.x` range or have a `v1` branch for the whole `1.x` development cycle. This would mean that people would automatically get the latest version and don't have to update their workflows.
The `xmllint-problem-matcher` action runner has released a new version which updates it to use node 16. This gets rid of a warning which was shown in the action logs. Note: I've [suggested to the author to use long-running branches for the action runner instead](korelstar/xmllint-problem-matcher#7), which would make this update redundant, but no telling if or when they'll respond to that, let alone if they will follow my suggestion. Refs: * https://github.com/korelstar/xmllint-problem-matcher/releases/tag/v1.1
The `xmllint-problem-matcher` action runner has released a new version which updates it to use node 16. This gets rid of a warning which was shown in the action logs. Note: I've [suggested to the author to use long-running branches for the action runner instead](korelstar/xmllint-problem-matcher#7), which would make this update redundant, but no telling if or when they'll respond to that, let alone if they will follow my suggestion. Refs: * https://github.com/korelstar/xmllint-problem-matcher/releases/tag/v1.1
The `xmllint-problem-matcher` action runner has released a new version which updates it to use node 16. This gets rid of a warning which was shown in the action logs. Note: I've [suggested to the author to use long-running branches for the action runner instead](korelstar/xmllint-problem-matcher#7), which would make this update redundant, but no telling if or when they'll respond to that, let alone if they will follow my suggestion. Refs: * https://github.com/korelstar/xmllint-problem-matcher/releases/tag/v1.1
The `xmllint-problem-matcher` action runner has released a new version which updates it to use node 16. This gets rid of a warning which was shown in the action logs. Note: I've [suggested to the author to use long-running branches for the action runner instead](korelstar/xmllint-problem-matcher#7), which would make this update redundant, but no telling if or when they'll respond to that, let alone if they will follow my suggestion. Refs: * https://github.com/korelstar/xmllint-problem-matcher/releases/tag/v1.1
The `xmllint-problem-matcher` action runner has released a new version which updates it to use node 16. This gets rid of a warning which was shown in the action logs. Note: I've [suggested to the author to use long-running branches for the action runner instead](korelstar/xmllint-problem-matcher#7), which would make this update redundant, but no telling if or when they'll respond to that, let alone if they will follow my suggestion. Refs: * https://github.com/korelstar/xmllint-problem-matcher/releases/tag/v1.1
The `xmllint-problem-matcher` action runner has released a new version which updates it to use node 16. This gets rid of a warning which was shown in the action logs. Note: I've [suggested to the author to use long-running branches for the action runner instead](korelstar/xmllint-problem-matcher#7), which would make this update redundant, but no telling if or when they'll respond to that, let alone if they will follow my suggestion. Refs: * https://github.com/korelstar/xmllint-problem-matcher/releases/tag/v1.1
Hey @jrfnl , thanks for your remarks! To be honest: I did some mistakes when publishing the last release (
Sorry for these confusions, this was not best practice. From now on, I will create releases using the semantic versioning structure (v Could you please check if everything is fine, now? |
@korelstar Sorry for my delayed response! I have tested with a couple of repos and can confirm all is fine now. For those repos in which I'd already switched to I will close this PR now as it is no longer needed. Thank you for your prompt action and for maintaining this project! |
Looks like this action runner is not using "long-running branches", which means that to use the latest version of this action runner, the usage instructions need to be updated.
Alternatively, please consider having a
v1
tag which moves on every release within the1.x
range or have av1
branch for the whole1.x
development cycle.This would mean that people would automatically get the latest version and don't have to update their workflows.