-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 381
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Merged by Bors] - feat(CategoryTheory): a sequential limit of surjections is surjective #13507
Conversation
…s second countable
Co-authored-by: Johan Commelin <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Johan Commelin <[email protected]>
…ountable profinite spaces
Is not it possible to deduce this from the results in |
That file deals mostly with cofiltered systems of finite sets. Here I have a cofiltered system (indexed by N^op) of light profinite sets, possibly inifinite. It is surely possible, however, to deduce this from a similar statement about inverse systems in |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM modulo the nitpick on naming.
Fixed the name |
Thanks! |
🚀 Pull request has been placed on the maintainer queue by erdOne. |
bors merge |
…#13507) We prove that in a concrete category whose forgetful functor preserves sequential limits, a sequential limit of surjections is surjective. Since this will be applied to `LightProfinite`, we provide the necessary instance to be able to apply this lemma as well.
Pull request successfully merged into master. Build succeeded: |
We prove that in a concrete category whose forgetful functor preserves sequential limits, a sequential limit of surjections is surjective. Since this will be applied to
LightProfinite
, we provide the necessary instance to be able to apply this lemma as well.This will be used in a future PR to prove that a sequential limit of epimorphisms in
LightCondSet
is an epimorphism.