-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 384
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Merged by Bors] - fix: add -lLake
argument to pole
and mk_all
#13850
Conversation
Since Lean 4.9, the behaviour of supportInterpreter executables has changed, makes this necessary: both of these executables require modules from lake, while does not.
PR summary 55b39bd4e8Import changesNo significant changes to the import graph Declarations diffNo declarations were harmed in the making of this PR! 🐙 You can run this locally as follows## summary with just the declaration names:
./scripts/no_lost_declarations.sh short <optional_commit>
## more verbose report:
./scripts/no_lost_declarations.sh <optional_commit> |
-lLake
argument to pole
and mk_all
On zulip, @Rida-Hamadani reports successfully testing this on windows. |
It succeeds only after deleting |
bors d+ |
✌️ grunweg can now approve this pull request. To approve and merge a pull request, simply reply with |
Co-authored-by: Kim Morrison <[email protected]>
Thanks for the review! |
Since Lean 4.9, the behaviour of `supportInterpreter` executables has changed, making this necessary: both of these executables require modules from `lake`. In contrast, `shake` also uses `supportInterpreter`, but does not depend on `lake`. [zulip discussion](https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/113488-general/topic/automatically.20generate.20ProjectName.2Elean/near/444239597)
Pull request successfully merged into master. Build succeeded: |
-lLake
argument to pole
and mk_all
-lLake
argument to pole
and mk_all
Since Lean 4.9, the behaviour of `supportInterpreter` executables has changed, making this necessary: both of these executables require modules from `lake`. In contrast, `shake` also uses `supportInterpreter`, but does not depend on `lake`. [zulip discussion](https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/113488-general/topic/automatically.20generate.20ProjectName.2Elean/near/444239597)
Since Lean 4.9, the behaviour of `supportInterpreter` executables has changed, making this necessary: both of these executables require modules from `lake`. In contrast, `shake` also uses `supportInterpreter`, but does not depend on `lake`. [zulip discussion](https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/113488-general/topic/automatically.20generate.20ProjectName.2Elean/near/444239597)
Since Lean 4.9, the behaviour of
supportInterpreter
executables has changed, making this necessary:both of these executables require modules from
lake
.In contrast,
shake
also usessupportInterpreter
, but does not depend onlake
.zulip discussion