Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Merged by Bors] - feat(Geometry/Manifold): state generalized Poincaré conjecture #13887

Closed
wants to merge 9 commits into from

Conversation

alreadydone
Copy link
Contributor


Open in Gitpod

@alreadydone alreadydone added awaiting-review RFC Request for comment t-differential-geometry Manifolds etc t-topology Topological spaces, uniform spaces, metric spaces, filters labels Jun 17, 2024
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jun 17, 2024

PR summary 61f96f8bc4

Import changes

No significant changes to the import graph


Declarations diff

+ ContinuousMap.HomotopyEquiv.NonemptyDiffeomorphSphere
++ instance (n : ℕ) :

You can run this locally as follows
## summary with just the declaration names:
./scripts/no_lost_declarations.sh short <optional_commit>

## more verbose report:
./scripts/no_lost_declarations.sh <optional_commit>

Copy link
Contributor

@ocfnash ocfnash left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ha, lovely!

I think it is probably a good idea to introduce:

class IsHomotopySphere (M : Type*) [TopologicalSpace M] (n : ℕ) : Prop :=
  nonempty_homotopyEquiv : Nonempty (ContinuousMap.HomotopyEquiv M S)

and

class IsTopologicalSphere (M : Type*) [TopologicalSpace M] (n : ℕ) : Prop :=
  nonempty_homoeomorph : Nonempty (Homeomorph M S)

I'll have a proper look this evening when I have some time (and try to remember if there was a reason I used structomorph rather than diffeomorph when I was over in ICERM).

@alreadydone alreadydone force-pushed the Poincare_conjecture branch from 321ea12 to 6b6f2c0 Compare June 17, 2024 21:32
@alreadydone alreadydone force-pushed the Poincare_conjecture branch from 6b6f2c0 to ccd60ba Compare June 17, 2024 21:33
@ocfnash
Copy link
Contributor

ocfnash commented Jun 19, 2024

What do you think about something like this:

def TopologicalPoincareConjecture (n : ℕ) : Prop :=
    ∀ (M : Type u) [TopologicalSpace M] [T2Space M] [ChartedSpace ℝⁿ M],
    M ≃ₕ 𝕊ⁿ → Nonempty (M ≃ₜ 𝕊ⁿ)

def SmoothPoincareConjecture (n : ℕ) : Prop :=
    ∀ (M : Type u) [TopologicalSpace M] [T2Space M] [ChartedSpace ℝⁿ M]
    [SmoothManifoldWithCorners (𝓡 n) M],
    M ≃ₕ 𝕊ⁿ → Nonempty (M ≃ₘ⟮𝓡 n, 𝓡 n⟯ 𝕊ⁿ)

proof_wanted TopologicalPoincareConjecture.proof : ∀ n, TopologicalPoincareConjecture n

proof_wanted SmoothPoincareConjecture.not_seven : ¬ SmoothPoincareConjecture 7

etc

@kim-em
Copy link
Contributor

kim-em commented Jul 1, 2024

bors merge

@github-actions github-actions bot added ready-to-merge This PR has been sent to bors. and removed awaiting-review labels Jul 1, 2024
@mathlib-bors
Copy link
Contributor

mathlib-bors bot commented Jul 1, 2024

Build failed (retrying...):

@mathlib-bors
Copy link
Contributor

mathlib-bors bot commented Jul 1, 2024

Pull request successfully merged into master.

Build succeeded:

@mathlib-bors mathlib-bors bot changed the title feat(Geometry/Manifold): state generalized Poincaré conjecture [Merged by Bors] - feat(Geometry/Manifold): state generalized Poincaré conjecture Jul 1, 2024
@mathlib-bors mathlib-bors bot closed this Jul 1, 2024
@mathlib-bors mathlib-bors bot deleted the Poincare_conjecture branch July 1, 2024 10:38
@adomani adomani mentioned this pull request Aug 1, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ready-to-merge This PR has been sent to bors. RFC Request for comment t-differential-geometry Manifolds etc t-topology Topological spaces, uniform spaces, metric spaces, filters
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants