-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 384
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Merged by Bors] - chore: categorise porting notes related to ext
#13928
Conversation
PR summary a694133598Import changesNo significant changes to the import graph Declarations diffNo declarations were harmed in the making of this PR! 🐙 You can run this locally as follows## summary with just the declaration names:
./scripts/no_lost_declarations.sh short <optional_commit>
## more verbose report:
./scripts/no_lost_declarations.sh <optional_commit> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Globally LGTM. I have resolved the merge conflict and suggested a few minor changes that can be directly committed from browser pretty quickly.
Co-Authored-By: Lorenzo Luccioli <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Pietro Monticone <[email protected]>
@joneugster @pitmonticone if you are both happy, I think this will be ready for merging. |
Yes, happy with that. |
me too! |
Thanks 🎉 bors merge |
Fix some porting notes about `ext` and classifies the remaining ones about `ext` Co-authored-by: Pietro Monticone <[email protected]>
Pull request successfully merged into master. Build succeeded: |
ext
ext
Fix some porting notes about `ext` and classifies the remaining ones about `ext` Co-authored-by: Pietro Monticone <[email protected]>
Fix some porting notes about
ext
and classifies the remaining ones aboutext
The remaining porting notes mentioning
ext
are categorised by the issues@[ext]
#11182ext
does not look through definitions, so we need moreext
lemmas #5229