Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Merged by Bors] - doc: fix diagram formatting #14492

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

Ruben-VandeVelde
Copy link
Collaborator


Open in Gitpod

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 7, 2024

PR summary 50d37c45c5

Import changes for modified files

No significant changes to the import graph

Import changes for all files
Files Import difference

Declarations diff

No declarations were harmed in the making of this PR! 🐙

You can run this locally as follows
## summary with just the declaration names:
./scripts/no_lost_declarations.sh short <optional_commit>

## more verbose report:
./scripts/no_lost_declarations.sh <optional_commit>

@grunweg
Copy link
Collaborator

grunweg commented Jul 7, 2024

Thanks for going over these! The changes seem plausible --- but I have no way to verify. Is there any way to look at the new documention, for instance, to check that the diagrams render better now?

Copy link
Member

@eric-wieser eric-wieser left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

bors d+

Thanks!

@@ -46,11 +46,13 @@ variable (h₁ : i₁ ≫ g₁ = f₁ ≫ i₂) (h₂ : i₂ ≫ g₂ = f₂ ≫

/-- Given

```
X₁ - f₁ -> X₂ - f₂ -> X₃
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Perhaps worth doing the horizontal arrows too

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Note that the fs are inside the arrow, so I'm not sure whether that'd be more or less readable

@mathlib-bors
Copy link
Contributor

mathlib-bors bot commented Jul 7, 2024

✌️ Ruben-VandeVelde can now approve this pull request. To approve and merge a pull request, simply reply with bors r+. More detailed instructions are available here.

@Ruben-VandeVelde
Copy link
Collaborator Author

bors merge

mathlib-bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 8, 2024
@mathlib-bors
Copy link
Contributor

mathlib-bors bot commented Jul 8, 2024

Pull request successfully merged into master.

Build succeeded:

@mathlib-bors mathlib-bors bot changed the title doc: fix diagram formatting [Merged by Bors] - doc: fix diagram formatting Jul 8, 2024
@mathlib-bors mathlib-bors bot closed this Jul 8, 2024
@mathlib-bors mathlib-bors bot deleted the diagrams branch July 8, 2024 10:46
@adomani adomani mentioned this pull request Aug 1, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants