Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Merged by Bors] - chore: remove two mathport syntax stubs #14693

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

grunweg
Copy link
Collaborator

@grunweg grunweg commented Jul 13, 2024

The hint and rw_search tactics have been implemented by now.


Open in Gitpod

grunweg added 2 commits July 13, 2024 04:17
That tactic exists now, and (in the words of its Lean 4 author) can be
improved further, but it is certainly not a stub any more.

rw_search? seems to be not implemented yet
This now exists as #register_hint.
Does this need a change in mathport first? Or am I overlooking something?
@grunweg grunweg added the tech debt Tracking cross-cutting technical debt, see e.g. the "Technical debt counters" stream on zulip label Jul 13, 2024
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 13, 2024

PR summary 5635f8abc6

Import changes for modified files

No significant changes to the import graph

Import changes for all files
Files Import difference

Declarations diff

No declarations were harmed in the making of this PR! 🐙

You can run this locally as follows
## summary with just the declaration names:
./scripts/declarations_diff.sh <optional_commit>

## more verbose report:
./scripts/declarations_diff.sh long <optional_commit>

@@ -225,7 +225,6 @@ syntax generalizingClause := " generalizing" (ppSpace ident)+
/- E -/ syntax (name := nthRwLHS) "nth_rw_lhs " num rwRuleSeq (location)? : tactic
/- E -/ syntax (name := nthRwRHS) "nth_rw_rhs " num rwRuleSeq (location)? : tactic

/- S -/ syntax (name := rwSearch) "rw_search" (config)? rwRuleSeq : tactic
/- S -/ syntax (name := rwSearch?) "rw_search?" (config)? rwRuleSeq : tactic
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this one can also be dropped, since rw? has been implemented.

cc @semorrison

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pushed a commit dropping this.

Copy link
Member

@jcommelin jcommelin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks 🎉

bors merge

@grunweg grunweg added the ready-to-merge This PR has been sent to bors. label Jul 15, 2024
mathlib-bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 15, 2024
The `hint` and `rw_search` tactics have been implemented by now.
@mathlib-bors
Copy link
Contributor

mathlib-bors bot commented Jul 15, 2024

Build failed (retrying...):

mathlib-bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 15, 2024
The `hint` and `rw_search` tactics have been implemented by now.
@mathlib-bors
Copy link
Contributor

mathlib-bors bot commented Jul 15, 2024

Pull request successfully merged into master.

Build succeeded:

@mathlib-bors mathlib-bors bot changed the title chore: remove two mathport syntax stubs [Merged by Bors] - chore: remove two mathport syntax stubs Jul 15, 2024
@mathlib-bors mathlib-bors bot closed this Jul 15, 2024
@mathlib-bors mathlib-bors bot deleted the MR-remove-syntax-stubs branch July 15, 2024 14:50
@adomani adomani mentioned this pull request Aug 1, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ready-to-merge This PR has been sent to bors. tech debt Tracking cross-cutting technical debt, see e.g. the "Technical debt counters" stream on zulip
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants