Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Merged by Bors] - chore: separate dependent typeclass assumptions #14746

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

adomani
Copy link
Collaborator

@adomani adomani commented Jul 15, 2024

Flagged by the linter at #14731.

If you are reviewing, there is a challenge: sectioning off IsDomain from IsDedekindDomain means that a lemma that before this PR had both in scope and actually really used IsDomain has suddenly become "worse", since now it only has IsDedekindDomain in scope.

I am thinking about how to automatically address this challenge, but for the moment, this is what there is! 😄


Open in Gitpod

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 15, 2024

PR summary 5161a43bf8

Import changes for modified files

No significant changes to the import graph

Import changes for all files
Files Import difference

Declarations diff

No declarations were harmed in the making of this PR! 🐙

You can run this locally as follows
## summary with just the declaration names:
./scripts/declarations_diff.sh <optional_commit>

## more verbose report:
./scripts/declarations_diff.sh long <optional_commit>

@urkud
Copy link
Member

urkud commented Jul 18, 2024

Can you generate doc pages for both versions (or otherwise pretty-print all theorems in the file) and compare them?

@mattrobball
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks!

bors delegate+

@mathlib-bors
Copy link
Contributor

mathlib-bors bot commented Jul 18, 2024

✌️ adomani can now approve this pull request. To approve and merge a pull request, simply reply with bors r+. More detailed instructions are available here.

@adomani
Copy link
Collaborator Author

adomani commented Jul 18, 2024

bors r+

mathlib-bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 18, 2024
Flagged by the linter at #14731.

If you are reviewing, there is a challenge: sectioning off `IsDomain` from `IsDedekindDomain` means that a lemma that before this PR had both in scope and actually really used `IsDomain` has suddenly become "worse", since now it only has `IsDedekindDomain` in scope.

I am thinking about how to automatically address this challenge, but for the moment, this is what there is!  😄
@mathlib-bors
Copy link
Contributor

mathlib-bors bot commented Jul 18, 2024

Pull request successfully merged into master.

Build succeeded:

@mathlib-bors mathlib-bors bot changed the title chore: separate dependent typeclass assumptions [Merged by Bors] - chore: separate dependent typeclass assumptions Jul 18, 2024
@mathlib-bors mathlib-bors bot closed this Jul 18, 2024
@mathlib-bors mathlib-bors bot deleted the adomani/dependent_typeclasses branch July 18, 2024 11:34
@adomani adomani mentioned this pull request Aug 1, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants