Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

feat: BitVec.getElem_zeroExtend #5247

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 4, 2024
Merged

feat: BitVec.getElem_zeroExtend #5247

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 4, 2024

Conversation

kim-em
Copy link
Collaborator

@kim-em kim-em commented Sep 4, 2024

No description provided.

@kim-em kim-em mentioned this pull request Sep 4, 2024
Closed
@kim-em kim-em enabled auto-merge September 4, 2024 02:11
@github-actions github-actions bot temporarily deployed to lean-lang.org/lean4/doc September 4, 2024 02:27 Inactive
@kim-em kim-em added this pull request to the merge queue Sep 4, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added the toolchain-available A toolchain is available for this PR, at leanprover/lean4-pr-releases:pr-release-NNNN label Sep 4, 2024
@leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Mathlib CI status (docs):

  • ❗ Batteries/Mathlib CI will not be attempted unless your PR branches off the nightly-with-mathlib branch. Try git rebase 4eea57841d1012d6c2edab0f270e433d43f92520 --onto 66688e10ceef553f48b935a74d9bbd096edf96f5. (2024-09-04 02:33:39)

Merged via the queue into master with commit 9587c67 Sep 4, 2024
14 checks passed
@kim-em kim-em deleted the getElem_zeroExtend branch September 4, 2024 03:36
@tobiasgrosser tobiasgrosser mentioned this pull request Sep 7, 2024
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
toolchain-available A toolchain is available for this PR, at leanprover/lean4-pr-releases:pr-release-NNNN
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@kim-em @leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot