-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
lntest: wait for ChanUpdate req to be fully processed before sending another #9574
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are limited to specific labels. 🏷️ Labels to auto review (1)
Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
1a74ba4
to
27b5c9a
Compare
…another Before this commit, it was possible for a request to be sent on the `chanWatchRequests` channel in `WaitForChannelPolicyUpdate` and then for the `ticker.C` case to select _before_ the `eventChan` select gets triggered when the `topologyWatcher` closes the `eventChan` in its call to `handlePolicyUpdateWatchRequest`. This could lead to a "close of a closed channel" panic. To fix this, this commit ensures that we only move on to the next iteration of the select statement in `WaitForChannelPolicyUpdate` once the request sent on `chanWatchRequests` has been fully handled.
27b5c9a
to
57c6c23
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Confirmed the itest failure is a flake.
Before this commit, it was possible for a request to be sent on the
chanWatchRequests
channel inWaitForChannelPolicyUpdate
and then for theticker.C
case to select before theeventChan
select gets triggered when thetopologyWatcher
closes theeventChan
in its call tohandlePolicyUpdateWatchRequest
. This could lead to a "close of a closed channel" panic.To fix this, this commit ensures that we only move on to the next iteration of the select statement in
WaitForChannelPolicyUpdate
once the request sent onchanWatchRequests
has been fully handled.See this build for an instance of where this panic was triggered.