Fix: word mute did not apply to quote notes

[qwreey]

What

Apply word mute on quoted note like replied note to ensure consistency

Why

Unlike replied note, word mute is not affect on quoted note

Additional info (optional)

Checklist

• Read the contribution guide
• Test working in a local environment
• (If needed) Add story of storybook
• (If needed) Update CHANGELOG.md
• (If possible) Add tests

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 78.90%. Comparing base (ebdb443) to head (4dc5774).
Report is 1711 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop   #12468      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    79.67%   78.90%   -0.77%     
===========================================
  Files          959      775     -184     
  Lines       108407    80156   -28251     
  Branches      8348     7840     -508     
===========================================
- Hits         86372    63248   -23124     
+ Misses       22035    16908    -5127     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[anatawa12]

#12376 で違う形で(引用ごとsoft muteされる)効くようにした記憶があります

[qwreey]

# 12376 에서 다른 형태로 (인용 당 soft mute되는) 효과를 낸 기억이 있습니다.

It's slightly different. The purpose of this commit is to ensure that the behavior of quote and reply is the same.
At your pull request, Main notes are well hidden, However, when the main note is opened, the subnotes are not hidden. unlike reply

[qwreey]

When open note, You can see that the purposes are different. (maybe...?)

[samunohito]

@syuilo
ちょっと取り込み是非を伺いたく…

以下があったとして、

• ワードミュート対象の単語を含んだノート（以下、ノートA）
• ワードミュート対象の単語を含まないが、ノートAを引用しているノート（以下、ノートB）

ノートBの中に表示されているノートAには、ワードミュートによる非表示機能が無いのでそれを追加しようという意図のようです。

[syuilo]

LGTM

[samunohito]

@qwreey
There seems to be no problem with the policy. However, there is a discrepancy in the source code, so I would like it to be resolved.

[qwreey]

@qwreey There seems to be no problem with the policy. However, there is a discrepancy in the source code, so I would like it to be resolved.

@samunohito Source code rebased. now, have no conflict! (I moved all commit to forward, for making git log clear)