Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

pin sqlite<3.49.1 #1799

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 20, 2025
Merged

pin sqlite<3.49.1 #1799

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 20, 2025

Conversation

emlys
Copy link
Member

@emlys emlys commented Feb 19, 2025

Description

See #1797

The issue is resolved by avoiding the latest sqlite version. sqlite is a conda package and not a python package, so there is no change to requirements.txt, just to the github actions workflow. If we determine that there is a real issue with this version, we might update the invest conda-forge feedstock to reflect that. For now, just getting the builds working.

Checklist

  • Updated HISTORY.rst and link to any relevant issue (if these changes are user-facing)
  • Updated the user's guide (if needed)
  • Tested the Workbench UI (if relevant)

@emlys emlys requested a review from phargogh February 19, 2025 23:06
@emlys emlys self-assigned this Feb 19, 2025
@emlys emlys marked this pull request as ready for review February 19, 2025 23:06
@dcdenu4
Copy link
Member

dcdenu4 commented Feb 20, 2025

Just jumping in to say that it looks like they made an issue in the sqlite feedstock: conda-forge/sqlite-feedstock#130

Copy link
Member

@phargogh phargogh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 the singular test failure appears to be due to a flaky recmodel connection with the local server, nothing to do with this PR.

@phargogh phargogh merged commit 2b4c7d3 into natcap:main Feb 20, 2025
28 of 29 checks passed
@emlys emlys mentioned this pull request Feb 28, 2025
3 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants