Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor safekeeper after model checking #315

Closed
4 tasks done
kelvich opened this issue Jul 12, 2021 · 1 comment
Closed
4 tasks done

Refactor safekeeper after model checking #315

kelvich opened this issue Jul 12, 2021 · 1 comment
Labels
c/storage/safekeeper Component: storage: safekeeper
Milestone

Comments

@kelvich
Copy link
Contributor

kelvich commented Jul 12, 2021

@arssher
Copy link
Contributor

arssher commented Aug 9, 2021

Rust part is finished, but let's merge #366 first and rebase on it to avoid doing separate rebase for C as well.

@mklgallegos mklgallegos removed the 10 sp label Aug 23, 2021
arssher added a commit to arssher/zenith that referenced this issue Aug 25, 2021
arssher added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 27, 2021
1) Extract consensus logic to safekeeper.rs.
2) Change the voting flow so that acceptor tells his epoch along with giving
   the vote, not before it; otherwise it might get immediately stale. #294
3) Process messages from compute atomically and sync state properly. #270
4) Use separate structs for disk and network.

ref #315
arssher added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 27, 2021
1) Extract consensus logic to safekeeper.rs.
2) Change the voting flow so that acceptor tells his epoch along with giving
   the vote, not before it; otherwise it might get immediately stale. #294
3) Process messages from compute atomically and sync state properly. #270
4) Use separate structs for disk and network.

ref #315
@kelvich kelvich closed this as completed Aug 30, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
c/storage/safekeeper Component: storage: safekeeper
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants