-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 130
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[translate] GFF files parsed differently if --genes
supplied
#1349
Labels
bug
Something isn't working
Comments
jameshadfield
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 5, 2023
TODO: Update CHANGES.md with PR number See comment added in code which details the previous behaviour. While silently skipping genes without the necessary attributes isn't the best solution in my opinion, it's at least now consistent (and also consistent with how we handle GenBank parsing). Closes #1349
jameshadfield
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 5, 2023
See comment added in code which details the previous behaviour. While silently skipping genes without the necessary attributes isn't the best solution in my opinion, it's at least now consistent (and also consistent with how we handle GenBank parsing). Closes #1349
jameshadfield
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 5, 2023
See comment added in code which details the previous behaviour. While silently skipping genes without the necessary attributes isn't the best solution in my opinion, it's at least now consistent (and also consistent with how we handle GenBank parsing). Closes #1349
jameshadfield
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 11, 2023
See comment added in code which details the previous behaviour. While silently skipping genes without the necessary attributes isn't the best solution in my opinion, it's at least now consistent (and also consistent with how we handle GenBank parsing). Closes #1349
jameshadfield
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 20, 2023
See comment added in code which details the previous behaviour. While silently skipping genes without the necessary attributes isn't the best solution in my opinion, it's at least now consistent (and also consistent with how we handle GenBank parsing). Closes #1349
jameshadfield
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 20, 2023
See comment added in code which details the previous behaviour. While silently skipping genes without the necessary attributes isn't the best solution in my opinion, it's at least now consistent (and also consistent with how we handle GenBank parsing). Closes #1349
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Current Behaviour
The code behaves differently if
feature_names
is supplied (via the--genes
argument).augur/augur/utils.py
Lines 165 to 180 in 7cb3848
Specifically, the existence of one of
{locus_tag, gene_name, gene}
is required if--genes
are not specified. This applies to thesource
entry as well.Expected behavior
--genes
should only perform filtering of features, not change how they are parsed.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: