-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 93
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add fancy write_source_waveform_unique #1119
Add fancy write_source_waveform_unique #1119
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1119 +/- ##
=========================================
- Coverage 91.38% 89.99% -1.4%
=========================================
Files 20 20
Lines 3623 3679 +56
=========================================
Hits 3311 3311
- Misses 312 368 +56
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
src/nidigital/templates/session.py/fancy_write_source_waveform_site_unique.py.mako
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Verified that my system test passes.
'description': '\nDictionary where each key is the site number and the value is array.array of unsigned int\n' | ||
}, | ||
'name': 'waveform_data', | ||
'type': 'ViUInt32', |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If this is ignored because "python-only" please add a comment.
What does this Pull Request accomplish?
write_source_waveform_unique()
List issues fixed by this Pull Request below, if any.
What testing has been done?