Add support for repeated capabilities on methods that support independent channels

[ni-erikcrank]

• This contribution adheres to CONTRIBUTING.md.
• [ ]I've updated CHANGELOG.md if applicable.
• [ ]I've added tests applicable for this pull request

The repeated capabilities functionality of attributes and methods will be tested after independent channels session constructor is implemented. System tests will be added as part of this Azure DevOps work item.

What does this Pull Request accomplish?

Adds repeated capabilities to methods that support independent channels.

List issues fixed by this Pull Request below, if any.

What testing has been done?

Verified that DCPower system tests pass.

[nimi-bot]

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #1589 (c03243c) into master (f9979a7) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1589   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.68%   91.68%           
=======================================
  Files          20       20           
  Lines        3463     3463           
=======================================
  Hits         3175     3175           
  Misses        288      288           

Flag	Coverage Δ
codegenunittests	88.27% <ø> (ø)
nifakeunittests	96.36% <ø> (ø)
nimodinstunittests	95.37% <ø> (ø)
nitclkunittests	95.61% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update f9979a7...c03243c. Read the comment docs.

[sbethur]

ok to test

[sbethur]

We need system tests to validate calling the updated entry points with rep caps. Please add a link or work item number in which that will be done.

[marcoskirsch]

@ni-erikcrank please re-run codegen and we'll merge.

[marcoskirsch]

We need system tests to validate calling the updated entry points with rep caps. Please add a link or work item number in which that will be done.

Why not in the same PR?

[marcoskirsch]

Awaiting system test changes

[ni-erikcrank]

System tests would not succeed until we have a constructor that allows creation of sessions with independent channels. I didn't want to submit failing system tests.

[marcoskirsch]

System tests would not succeed until we have a constructor that allows creation of sessions with independent channels. I didn't want to submit failing system tests.

I think they would, if you pass something equivalent to "all the channels in the session" such as "" or something else. Nevertheless, as long as you have the Issue to remind us to do it in a cleaner manner, that's fine with me.

[ni-erikcrank]

Let me know if you are still awaiting changes/actions from me.

[sbethur]

Let me know if you are still awaiting changes/actions from me.

There are merge conflicts you need to resolve.