Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: support signing via v15 metadata proof #2448

Open
wants to merge 55 commits into
base: base/sign-with-proof
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ERussel
Copy link
Contributor

@ERussel ERussel commented Mar 9, 2025

Purpose

This PR adds an option to sign extrinsic without requiring latest metadata for a chain. The chain still needs to be added to the App via chain spec scaning.

Scope

  • introduce new message type (6) that requires scale encoded metadata proof in the parameters: <network_type>|<crypto_type>|<message_type>|<account_id>|<metadata_proof>|<call>|<extensions>|<genesis_hash>

  • introduce StateMachine implementation to decode call and extensions based on the proof types into a list of cards to display in the interface

krodak and others added 30 commits April 26, 2024 10:37
* Revert "chore(deps): bump raptorq from 1.8.1 to 2.0.0 in /rust (#2372)"

This reverts commit d31f553.

* fix: allow ded_code

* fix: permission for semantic workflow

* fix: clippy

* fix: change semantic permission to write

* fix: change token usage

* fix: pull_request event

* fix: add concurency

* fix: add actor

* fix: lint problem

* fix: change signing cecrt

* fix: change appfile

* change team id

* fix: semantic triggers

* fix: change actors

* fix: remove unnecessary changes

* fix: return semantic run back

* fix: temp add stepanLav

---------

Co-authored-by: valentunn <[email protected]>
@ERussel ERussel changed the title Support signing via v15 metadata proof feat: support signing via v15 metadata proof Mar 9, 2025
@ERussel ERussel marked this pull request as ready for review March 10, 2025 11:06
@ERussel ERussel requested a review from valentunn March 10, 2025 11:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants