Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[new release] capnp-rpc (3 packages) (2.1) #27365

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 4, 2025

Conversation

talex5
Copy link
Contributor

@talex5 talex5 commented Feb 4, 2025

Cap'n Proto is a capability-based RPC system with bindings for many languages

CHANGES:

Build and opam metadata:

CHANGES:

- Update to mirage-crypto-rng 1.2.0 (@talex5 mirage/capnp-rpc#313).
  There is no need to do `Mirage_crypto_rng_eio.run` now.

- `Restorer.Table.create` now takes a switch (@talex5 mirage/capnp-rpc#306).
  The table is now cleared when the switch finishes. Avoids having to remember to set this up manually.

- Update README now that 2.0 is released (@talex5 mirage/capnp-rpc#307 mirage/capnp-rpc#308).

Build and opam metadata:

- OCaml 5.2 is the minimum version (@talex5 mirage/capnp-rpc#305).

- Update Windows CI (@smorimoto mirage/capnp-rpc#310 mirage/capnp-rpc#311).

- Add `x-maintenance-intent` to opam files (@talex5 mirage/capnp-rpc#315, requested by @hannesm).

- Remove capnp-rpc-lwt compatibility package (@talex5 mirage/capnp-rpc#314).
  The existing release should continue working; no point releasing an unchanged version every time there's a capnp-rpc release.
@talex5
Copy link
Contributor Author

talex5 commented Feb 4, 2025

Summary of CI errors:

  • The # kj/filesystem-disk-unix.c++:305: failed: ::fstat(fd, &stats): Value too large for defined data type failures are due to inode numbers not fitting in 32 bits (fixed in Debian/unstable).

  • Windows fails (as usual) because conf-capnproto doesn't install there.

So this looks OK to me.

@mseri
Copy link
Member

mseri commented Feb 4, 2025

Thanks

@mseri mseri merged commit 11c78f9 into ocaml:master Feb 4, 2025
1 of 3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants