Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

descriptor: Replace "supported" with "registered" #668

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 12, 2017
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
24 changes: 12 additions & 12 deletions descriptor.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -78,18 +78,18 @@ encoded := /[a-zA-Z0-9=_-]+/

Some example digest strings include the following:

digest | algorithm | Supported |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------|-----------|
`sha256:6c3c624b58dbbcd3c0dd82b4c53f04194d1247c6eebdaab7c610cf7d66709b3b` | [SHA-256](#sha-256) | Yes |
`sha512:401b09eab3c013d4ca54922bb802bec8fd5318192b0a75f201d8b372742...` | [SHA-512](#sha-512) | Yes |
`multihash+base58:QmRZxt2b1FVZPNqd8hsiykDL3TdBDeTSPX9Kv46HmX4Gx8` | Multihash | No |
`sha256+b64u:LCa0a2j_xo_5m0U8HTBBNBNCLXBkg7-g-YpeiGJm564` | SHA-256 with urlsafe base64 | No|

Please see [Registered Algorithms](#registered-algorithms) for a list of supported algorithms.

Implementations SHOULD allow digests that are unsupported to pass validation if they comply with the above grammar.
While `sha256` will only use hex encoded digests, support for separators in _algorithm_ and alpha numeric in _encoded_ is included to allow for future extension of digest support.
As an example, we can paramterize the encoding and algorithm as `multihash+base58:QmRZxt2b1FVZPNqd8hsiykDL3TdBDeTSPX9Kv46HmX4Gx8`, which would be considered valid but unsupported by this specification.
digest | algorithm | Registered |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------|------------|
`sha256:6c3c624b58dbbcd3c0dd82b4c53f04194d1247c6eebdaab7c610cf7d66709b3b` | [SHA-256](#sha-256) | Yes |
`sha512:401b09eab3c013d4ca54922bb802bec8fd5318192b0a75f201d8b372742...` | [SHA-512](#sha-512) | Yes |
`multihash+base58:QmRZxt2b1FVZPNqd8hsiykDL3TdBDeTSPX9Kv46HmX4Gx8` | Multihash | No |
`sha256+b64u:LCa0a2j_xo_5m0U8HTBBNBNCLXBkg7-g-YpeiGJm564` | SHA-256 with urlsafe base64 | No |

Please see [Registered Algorithms](#registered-algorithms) for a list of registered algorithms.

Implementations SHOULD allow digests with unrecognized algorithms to pass validation if they comply with the above grammar.
While `sha256` will only use hex encoded digests, separators in _algorithm_ and alphanumerics in _encoded_ are included to allow for extensions.
As an example, we can parameterize the encoding and algorithm as `multihash+base58:QmRZxt2b1FVZPNqd8hsiykDL3TdBDeTSPX9Kv46HmX4Gx8`, which would be considered valid but unregistered by this specification.

### Verification

Expand Down