-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 532
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
CCXDEV-14850: insights add storage spec #2200
CCXDEV-14850: insights add storage spec #2200
Conversation
Hello @opokornyy! Some important instructions when contributing to openshift/api: |
@opokornyy: This pull request references CCXDEV-14850 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the task to target the "4.19.0" version, but no target version was set. In response to this: Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
@opokornyy: This pull request references CCXDEV-14850 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the task to target the "4.19.0" version, but no target version was set. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
85b9fa1
to
fd752c0
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
One additional comment after looking over the most recent changes. Other than that I think this looks good.
fd752c0
to
6fece25
Compare
What should I do about the error in tests? It adds a new required field, but it is wrapped in an optional struct, so IMO it should be fine right?
|
Looking at the failure, it looks like this check is safe to override. I don't have permissions to do this, so it'll be up to Joel to do that when he gives a review. |
d0106ae
to
0a44668
Compare
345e3b1
to
9faae6b
Compare
5e680a5
to
a8e3dca
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Apologies for missing it, but I had totally missed the validation changes to insights/v1alpha1/types_insights.go until now.
Aside from the one comment on the config/v1alpha1 changes those look good to me.
0832c9f
to
b14ab02
Compare
Signed-off-by: Ondrej Pokorny <[email protected]>
b14ab02
to
7644f6c
Compare
insights/v1alpha1/tests/datagathers.insights.openshift.io/InsightsOnDemandDataGather.yaml
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
config/v1alpha1/tests/insightsdatagathers.config.openshift.io/InsightsConfig.yaml
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
config/v1alpha1/tests/insightsdatagathers.config.openshift.io/InsightsConfig.yaml
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Signed-off-by: Ondrej Pokorny <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ondrej Pokorny <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A couple small things. Other than that, this looks good. Will give approval after they are addressed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If you can please apply the suggestions and copy them over to the other version of the API too, then I think this is good to go, thanks
Signed-off-by: Ondrej Pokorny <[email protected]>
8316b1e
to
c65ff8d
Compare
/override ci/prow/verify-crd-schema False positives. The required fields it's indicating are within an optional parent struct and therefore are not actually newly required /lgtm |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: everettraven, JoelSpeed, opokornyy The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
@JoelSpeed: Overrode contexts on behalf of JoelSpeed: ci/prow/verify-crd-schema In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
@opokornyy: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER] Distgit: ose-cluster-config-api |
This PR adds fields to the
DataGather
andInsightsDataGather
CRDs, allowing users to specify the Persistent Volume spec for on-demand gathering jobs.