Update pyparsing to 2.3.0

[pyup-bot]

This PR updates pyparsing from 2.2.2 to 2.3.0.

Changelog

2.3.0

-----------------------------
- NEW SUPPORT FOR UNICODE CHARACTER RANGES
This release introduces the pyparsing_unicode namespace class, defining
a series of language character sets to simplify the definition of alphas,
nums, alphanums, and printables in the following language sets:
. Arabic
. Chinese
. Cyrillic
. Devanagari
. Greek
. Hebrew
. Japanese (including Kanji, Katakana, and Hirigana subsets)
. Korean
. Latin1 (includes 7 and 8-bit Latin characters)
. Thai
. CJK (combination of Chinese, Japanese, and Korean sets)

For example, your code can define words using:

 korean_word = Word(pyparsing_unicode.Korean.alphas)

See their use in the updated examples greetingInGreek.py and
greetingInKorean.py.

This namespace class also offers access to these sets using their
unicode identifiers.

- POSSIBLE API CHANGE: Fixed bug where a parse action that explicitly 
returned the input ParseResults could add another nesting level in
the results if the current expression had a results name.

     vals = pp.OneOrMore(pp.pyparsing_common.integer)("int_values")
     
     def add_total(tokens):
         tokens['total'] = sum(tokens)
         return tokens   this line can be removed

     vals.addParseAction(add_total)
     print(vals.parseString("244 23 13 2343").dump())

Before the fix, this code would print (note the extra nesting level):

 [244, 23, 13, 2343]
 - int_values: [244, 23, 13, 2343]
   - int_values: [244, 23, 13, 2343]
   - total: 2623
 - total: 2623

With the fix, this code now prints:

 [244, 23, 13, 2343]
 - int_values: [244, 23, 13, 2343]
 - total: 2623

This fix will change the structure of ParseResults returned if a 
program defines a parse action that returns the tokens that were 
sent in. This is not necessary, and statements like "return tokens" 
in the example above can be safely deleted prior to upgrading to 
this release, in order to avoid the bug and get the new behavior.

Reported by seron in Issue 22, nice catch!

- POSSIBLE API CHANGE: Fixed a related bug where a results name 
erroneously created a second level of hierarchy in the returned 
ParseResults. The intent for accumulating results names into ParseResults
is that, in the absence of Group'ing, all names get merged into a
common namespace. This allows us to write:

    key_value_expr = (Word(alphas)("key") + '=' + Word(nums)("value"))
    result = key_value_expr.parseString("a = 100") 
 
and have result structured as {"key": "a", "value": "100"} 
instead of [{"key": "a"}, {"value": "100"}].

However, if a named expression is used in a higher-level non-Group 
expression that *also* has a name, a false sub-level would be created 
in the namespace:

     num = pp.Word(pp.nums)
     num_pair = ("[" + (num("A") + num("B"))("values") + "]")
     U = num_pair.parseString("[ 10 20 ]")
     print(U.dump())

Since there is no grouping, "A", "B", and "values" should all appear
at the same level in the results, as:

     ['[', '10', '20', ']']
     - A: '10'
     - B: '20'
     - values: ['10', '20']

Instead, an extra level of "A" and "B" show up under "values":

     ['[', '10', '20', ']']
     - A: '10'
     - B: '20'
     - values: ['10', '20']
       - A: '10'
       - B: '20'

This bug has been fixed. Now, if this hierarchy is desired, then a
Group should be added:

     num_pair = ("[" + pp.Group(num("A") + num("B"))("values") + "]")

Giving:

     ['[', ['10', '20'], ']']
     - values: ['10', '20']
       - A: '10'
       - B: '20'

But in no case should "A" and "B" appear in multiple levels. This bug-fix
fixes that.

If you have current code which relies on this behavior, then add or remove
Groups as necessary to get your intended results structure.

Reported by Athanasios Anastasiou.

- IndexError's raised in parse actions will get explicitly reraised 
as ParseExceptions that wrap the original IndexError. Since 
IndexError sometimes occurs as part of pyparsing's normal parsing 
logic, IndexErrors that are raised during a parse action may have
gotten silently reinterpreted as parsing errors. To retain the 
information from the IndexError, these exceptions will now be 
raised as ParseExceptions that reference the original IndexError. 
This wrapping will only be visible when run under Python3, since it
emulates "raise ... from ..." syntax. 

Addresses Issue 4, reported by guswns0528.

- Added Char class to simplify defining expressions of a single
character. (Char("abc") is equivalent to Word("abc", exact=1))

- Added class PrecededBy to perform lookbehind tests. PrecededBy is 
used in the same way as FollowedBy, passing in an expression that
must occur just prior to the current parse location.

For fixed-length expressions like a Literal, Keyword, Char, or a 
Word with an `exact` or `maxLen` length given, `PrecededBy(expr)` 
is sufficient. For varying length expressions like a Word with no 
given maximum length, `PrecededBy` must be constructed with an 
integer `retreat` argument, as in 
`PrecededBy(Word(alphas, nums), retreat=10)`, to specify the maximum 
number of characters pyparsing must look backward to make a match. 
pyparsing will check all the values from 1 up to retreat characters 
back from the current parse location.

When stepping backwards through the input string, PrecededBy does 
*not* skip over whitespace.

PrecededBy can be created with a results name so that, even though
it always returns an empty parse result, the result *can* include
named results.

Idea first suggested in Issue 30 by Freakwill.

- Updated FollowedBy to accept expressions that contain named results,
so that results names defined in the lookahead expression will be 
returned, even though FollowedBy always returns an empty list.
Inspired by the same feature implemented in PrecededBy.

Links

• PyPI: https://pypi.org/project/pyparsing
• Changelog: https://pyup.io/changelogs/pyparsing/
• Repo: https://github.com/pyparsing/pyparsing/
• Docs: https://pythonhosted.org/pyparsing/