-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 44
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[WIP] Solved tap position + solved section count #2978
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Coline PILOQUET <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Coline PILOQUET <[email protected]>
Thanks for this work! I am going to look at it, with the help of @zamarrenolm because we have to choose the good getter for CGMES SSH and SV exports, and check all the getters and setters. But, before, after a small talk, we agreed on:
|
Signed-off-by: Coline PILOQUET <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Florian Dupuy <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Coline PILOQUET <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Coline PILOQUET <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Coline PILOQUET <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Coline PILOQUET <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Coline PILOQUET <[email protected]>
1b2053b
to
bb42f79
Compare
@@ -219,7 +227,7 @@ public ShuntCompensatorImpl add() { | |||
ShuntCompensatorImpl shunt = new ShuntCompensatorImpl(getNetworkRef(), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am not sure how to deal with the validation.
@@ -177,6 +179,12 @@ public ShuntCompensatorAdder setSectionCount(int sectionCount) { | |||
return this; | |||
} | |||
|
|||
@Override | |||
public ShuntCompensatorAdder setSolvedSectionCount(int solvedSectionCount) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we want an unset too?
Signed-off-by: Coline PILOQUET <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Coline PILOQUET <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Coline PILOQUET <[email protected]>
|
Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements
Does this PR already have an issue describing the problem?
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
What is the current behavior?
What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?
Does this PR introduce a breaking change or deprecate an API?
If yes, please check if the following requirements are fulfilled
What changes might users need to make in their application due to this PR? (migration steps)
Other information: