gh-105288: wake up exit waiters after sub-process exits #105289
Conversation
keuin
requested review from
1st1,
asvetlov,
gvanrossum,
kumaraditya303 and
willingc
as code owners
|
All commit authors signed the Contributor License Agreement. |
keuin
force-pushed
the
bugfix-asyncio-issue-gh-105288
branch
from
210bfce to
54bbc06
Compare
keuin
force-pushed
the
bugfix-asyncio-issue-gh-105288
branch
from
54bbc06 to
a54ad6f
Compare
|
@kumaraditya303 Once you are convinced of the validity of the issue (which I expect you will be), will you review ad merge this PR? I was on vacation for 10 days and am way behind. |
|
As evident by the failing CI this is wrong. |
|
@kumaraditya303 Whoa. Why close the PR instead of requesting changes? |
|
I will fix my test in these days. Sorry because I'm not familiar with the test framework and testing a frozen event loop is much harder than usual. |
|
A Python core developer has requested some changes be made to your pull request before we can consider merging it. If you could please address their requests along with any other requests in other reviews from core developers that would be appreciated. Once you have made the requested changes, please leave a comment on this pull request containing the phrase And if you don't make the requested changes, you will be poked with soft cushions! |
|
What's going on here? |
| # We have to run the event loop in a separate thread, | ||
| # to make sure we can fail in the main thread | ||
| # and successfully notify the test driver. | ||
| self.loop.run_until_complete(main()) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
the problem is in asyncio.run - so this doesn't actually test the issue
|
I think this issue is a duplicate of others. The misuse of argument shows some deep resource leak, but is hard to find the root cause. |
asyncio.waithang if there are async subprocess tasks #105288