gh-96397: Document that attributes need not be identifiers #96454
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Clarify that the name of an attribute need not be a valid Python identifier, in particular through setarr(), noting that this precludes use of the dot notation to access them.
This was referenced Sep 13, 2022
merwok
approved these changes
Sep 22, 2022
|
Could this be merged, or have I more to do? |
gvanrossum
approved these changes
Sep 29, 2022
Co-authored-by: C.A.M. Gerlach <[email protected]>
gvanrossum
added
needs backport to 3.10
|
Thanks @jeff5 for the PR, and @gvanrossum for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.10. |
|
Thanks @jeff5 for the PR, and @gvanrossum for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.11. |
|
GH-97658 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.10 branch. |
bedevere-bot
removed
needs backport to 3.10
|
GH-97659 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.11 branch. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Companion to #96393, and stemming from points made in the discussions at https://discuss.python.org/t/supporting-or-not-invalid-identifiers-in-kwargs/17147/26 and #96397, this proposes extending how we define "attribute" to match the behaviour of implementations and some current user practice.
Needs SC discussion, I believe.