Take the best of both README templates #1287
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Looks great - thanks! |
|
This patch has been corrupted in master, working on restoring it. |
|
Luckily, it was only the master branch in my fork. Please ignore. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Unify the template for README.Rmd and README.md, so that both contain scaffold for
I expanded the help. The use of whisker/mustache is very much "brute force" but it's simple to maintain.
The first commit should be taken, no matter what, as it fixes a general problem with
use_template()& RStudio.I'm happy to write tests (and have tested all 4 combinations of Rmd vs md * Github yes vs no), but I didn't see any others for this sort of thing.