-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Implement renaming dependencies in the manifest #4953
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -947,28 +947,44 @@ Cargo.toml. This warning might turn into a hard error in the future.", | |
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
for unit in dep_targets { | ||
if unit.profile.run_custom_build { | ||
cmd.env("OUT_DIR", &cx.build_script_out_dir(&unit)); | ||
for dep in dep_targets { | ||
if dep.profile.run_custom_build { | ||
cmd.env("OUT_DIR", &cx.build_script_out_dir(&dep)); | ||
} | ||
if unit.target.linkable() && !unit.profile.doc { | ||
link_to(cmd, cx, &unit)?; | ||
if dep.target.linkable() && !dep.profile.doc { | ||
link_to(cmd, cx, &unit, &dep)?; | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
return Ok(()); | ||
|
||
fn link_to<'a, 'cfg>(cmd: &mut ProcessBuilder, | ||
cx: &mut Context<'a, 'cfg>, | ||
unit: &Unit<'a>) -> CargoResult<()> { | ||
for &(ref dst, _, file_type) in cx.target_filenames(unit)?.iter() { | ||
current: &Unit<'a>, | ||
dep: &Unit<'a>) -> CargoResult<()> { | ||
for &(ref dst, _, file_type) in cx.target_filenames(dep)?.iter() { | ||
if file_type != TargetFileType::Linkable { | ||
continue | ||
} | ||
let mut v = OsString::new(); | ||
v.push(&unit.target.crate_name()); | ||
|
||
// Unfortunately right now Cargo doesn't have a great way to get a | ||
// 1:1 mapping of entries in `dependencies()` to the actual crate | ||
// we're depending on. Instead we're left to do some guesswork here | ||
// to figure out what `Dependency` the `dep` unit corresponds to in | ||
// `current` to see if we're renaming it. | ||
// | ||
// This I believe mostly works out for now, but we'll likely want | ||
// to tighten up this in the future. | ||
let name = current.pkg.dependencies() | ||
.iter() | ||
.filter(|d| d.matches_ignoring_source(dep.pkg.summary())) | ||
.filter_map(|d| d.rename()) | ||
.next(); | ||
|
||
v.push(name.unwrap_or(&dep.target.crate_name())); | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Could we make this |
||
v.push("="); | ||
v.push(cx.out_dir(unit)); | ||
v.push(cx.out_dir(dep)); | ||
v.push(&path::MAIN_SEPARATOR.to_string()); | ||
v.push(&dst.file_name().unwrap()); | ||
cmd.arg("--extern").arg(&v); | ||
|
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd call it
package
, to be consistent with thepackage
in the surface syntax, and to make it more clear in which direction renaming goes (I.e, in theory you can have a crate foo which is renamed to pacakge baz, or, the other way around, a package baz which is renamed to crate foo).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh this is slightly different through b/c it's not actually the package, but rather what the dependency is renaming the crate to
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, even though there's a one-to-one correspondence with the
package
attribute,rename
probably makes more sense in code (perhaps with a comment?)... that's my thought, anyway.