Report correct SelectionError for ConstArgHasType in new solver fulfill
#134771
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
|
Some changes occurred to the core trait solver cc @rust-lang/initiative-trait-system-refactor |
compiler-errors
commented
Dec 25, 2024
| }; | ||
| FulfillmentErrorCode::Select(SelectionError::ConstArgHasWrongType { | ||
| ct, | ||
| ct_ty, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It would be convenient if the selection error didn't have to store the const type, but if we re-derived it in the error reporting code.
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 6, 2025
…-err, r=lcnr Report correct `SelectionError` for `ConstArgHasType` in new solver fulfill r? `@BoxyUwU`
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 6, 2025
…iaskrgr Rollup of 4 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#134742 (Use `PostBorrowckAnalysis` in `check_coroutine_obligations`) - rust-lang#134771 (Report correct `SelectionError` for `ConstArgHasType` in new solver fulfill) - rust-lang#135146 (Don't enable anyhow's `backtrace` feature in opt-dist) - rust-lang#135153 (chore: remove redundant words in comment) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 6, 2025
Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#134742 (Use `PostBorrowckAnalysis` in `check_coroutine_obligations`) - rust-lang#134771 (Report correct `SelectionError` for `ConstArgHasType` in new solver fulfill) - rust-lang#134951 (Suppress host effect predicates if underlying trait doesn't hold) - rust-lang#135097 (bootstrap: Consolidate coverage test suite steps into a single step) - rust-lang#135146 (Don't enable anyhow's `backtrace` feature in opt-dist) - rust-lang#135153 (chore: remove redundant words in comment) - rust-lang#135157 (Move the has_errors check in rustdoc back to after TyCtxt is created) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 6, 2025
…iaskrgr Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#134742 (Use `PostBorrowckAnalysis` in `check_coroutine_obligations`) - rust-lang#134771 (Report correct `SelectionError` for `ConstArgHasType` in new solver fulfill) - rust-lang#134951 (Suppress host effect predicates if underlying trait doesn't hold) - rust-lang#135097 (bootstrap: Consolidate coverage test suite steps into a single step) - rust-lang#135146 (Don't enable anyhow's `backtrace` feature in opt-dist) - rust-lang#135153 (chore: remove redundant words in comment) - rust-lang#135157 (Move the has_errors check in rustdoc back to after TyCtxt is created) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 7, 2025
Rollup merge of rust-lang#134771 - compiler-errors:const-arg-has-type-err, r=lcnr Report correct `SelectionError` for `ConstArgHasType` in new solver fulfill r? ``@BoxyUwU``
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 14, 2025
…r=lcnr Make sure we can produce `ConstArgHasWrongType` errors for valtree consts I forgot about `ty::ConstKind::Value` in rust-lang#134771. The error message here could use some work -- both in the new trait solver and the old trait solver. But unrelated to the issue here. Fixes rust-lang#135361 -- this was only ICEing in coherence because coherence uses the new trait solver, but I don't think the minimization is worth committing compared to the test I added. r? `@lcnr` or `@BoxyUwU`
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 14, 2025
…r=lcnr Make sure we can produce `ConstArgHasWrongType` errors for valtree consts I forgot about `ty::ConstKind::Value` in rust-lang#134771. The error message here could use some work -- both in the new trait solver and the old trait solver. But unrelated to the issue here. Fixes rust-lang#135361 -- this was only ICEing in coherence because coherence uses the new trait solver, but I don't think the minimization is worth committing compared to the test I added. r? ``@lcnr`` or ``@BoxyUwU``
workingjubilee
added a commit
to workingjubilee/rustc
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 15, 2025
…r=lcnr Make sure we can produce `ConstArgHasWrongType` errors for valtree consts I forgot about `ty::ConstKind::Value` in rust-lang#134771. The error message here could use some work -- both in the new trait solver and the old trait solver. But unrelated to the issue here. Fixes rust-lang#135361 -- this was only ICEing in coherence because coherence uses the new trait solver, but I don't think the minimization is worth committing compared to the test I added. r? ```@lcnr``` or ```@BoxyUwU```
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 15, 2025
Rollup merge of rust-lang#135380 - compiler-errors:mismatch-valtree, r=lcnr Make sure we can produce `ConstArgHasWrongType` errors for valtree consts I forgot about `ty::ConstKind::Value` in rust-lang#134771. The error message here could use some work -- both in the new trait solver and the old trait solver. But unrelated to the issue here. Fixes rust-lang#135361 -- this was only ICEing in coherence because coherence uses the new trait solver, but I don't think the minimization is worth committing compared to the test I added. r? ```@lcnr``` or ```@BoxyUwU```
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
r? @BoxyUwU