-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[beta] backport of readd capture disjoint fields gate #85893
Conversation
(and thus exposed underlying issue rust-lang#85561).
Apply suggestions from code review: 1. (removing confusing comment from my test, since the comment reflects the bad undesirable behavior that is being fixed here.) 2. test THIR unsafeck too. Co-authored-by: Léo Lanteri Thauvin <[email protected]>
r? @varkor (rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
argh that's what I get for trusting that the test would trivially work when backported. will fix. |
remove testing via `-Z thir-unsafeck`, since it is not appropriate for beta branch.
r=me |
@bors r=simulacrum |
📌 Commit f9f5fc8 has been approved by |
@bors rollup=never |
⌛ Testing commit f9f5fc8 with merge 3554ba4b26dea7c8ee1aa3633b709276b077a994... |
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
|
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
@bors retry |
⌛ Testing commit f9f5fc8 with merge f676e1dc994234fd9204368679ff9f5b5df7944d... |
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
|
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
⌛ Testing commit f9f5fc8 with merge 78192079381e08ace362f0b640641085d19de010... |
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
|
CI issue has been fixed, @bors retry |
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
Beta backport of "readd capture disjoint fields gate", PR #85564
Fix issue #85435