Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Union discussions #369

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

alercah
Copy link

@alercah alercah commented Oct 15, 2022

Assumes #365 and #368 are merged.

* Is `#[repr(Rust)]` the bag-o-bytes union repr, or do we want to propose a new repr?
* *Discussion:* [#73: Validity of unions][#73]
* The following questions are all implicitly answered if `#[repr(Rust)]` is the bag-o-bytes repr, but remain open if not:
* Do `#[repr(Rust)]` unions guarantee all fields at offset 0?
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Even bag-of-bytes unions could have fields at non-0 offsets. Not sure if there is any reason to do that, but this makes it sound like there is a necessary logical implication from bag-of-bytes to 0-offset, which I don't think is the case.

* *Discussion*: [#353: Offsets of union fields][#353]
* Do `#[repr(Rust)]` unions have internal padding?
* *Discussion*: [#354: Do #[repr(Rust)] unions have internal padding?][#354]
* Do `#[repr(transparent)]` unions ever have niches?
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This one, OTOH, is answered by bag-of-bytes -- right?

@RalfJung
Copy link
Member

RalfJung commented Aug 1, 2023

Closing due to inactivity. Note that the UCG book isn't really maintained these days -- probably the proper thing would be to write up a markdown document, schedule a t-opsem meeting, use that to update the document, and then FCP the result.

@RalfJung RalfJung closed this Aug 1, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants