Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Explicit layout and fix dense tensor printing #354

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Dec 12, 2024

Conversation

ntjohnson1
Copy link
Collaborator

@ntjohnson1 ntjohnson1 commented Dec 7, 2024

Fixes #338 and also makes progress towards being more explicit/consistent about our Fortran formatting discussed here and here

We probably want to capture the fortran ordering in our documentation somewhere and I should probably open an issue to make the ordering flow throughout pyttb so we can eventually support "C" ordering as well.


📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://pyttb--354.org.readthedocs.build/en/354/

@ntjohnson1 ntjohnson1 marked this pull request as ready for review December 7, 2024 01:16
@ntjohnson1 ntjohnson1 requested a review from dmdunla December 7, 2024 01:16
@dmdunla
Copy link
Collaborator

dmdunla commented Dec 12, 2024

@ntjohnson1 Sorry, I did not fix the merge conflicts correctly after the auto-merge of main into your branch. I tried to make the changes in a Codespace on your fork, but it did not let me push to your branch.

I got confused about the state of the updates, as the conflicts had partial fixes for order and Shape, and I did not resolve correclty.

Can you please fix this when you get a chence?

@dmdunla dmdunla merged commit 396fa7f into sandialabs:main Dec 12, 2024
9 checks passed
@ntjohnson1 ntjohnson1 deleted the nick/layout branch December 12, 2024 21:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Display tensors by frontal slice rather than lateral slice
2 participants