Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix Kafka LogReader failing when attempting to store offsets in Zookeeper #2615

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 4, 2025

Conversation

Kerkesni
Copy link
Contributor

Kafka manages the offsets when using Kafka logReader. Skipped step in code where we attempt to store the offset in Zookeeper when using the Kafka LogReader.

Issue: BB-481

@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Feb 18, 2025

Hello kerkesni,

My role is to assist you with the merge of this
pull request. Please type @bert-e help to get information
on this process, or consult the user documentation.

Available options
name description privileged authored
/after_pull_request Wait for the given pull request id to be merged before continuing with the current one.
/bypass_author_approval Bypass the pull request author's approval
/bypass_build_status Bypass the build and test status
/bypass_commit_size Bypass the check on the size of the changeset TBA
/bypass_incompatible_branch Bypass the check on the source branch prefix
/bypass_jira_check Bypass the Jira issue check
/bypass_peer_approval Bypass the pull request peers' approval
/bypass_leader_approval Bypass the pull request leaders' approval
/approve Instruct Bert-E that the author has approved the pull request. ✍️
/create_pull_requests Allow the creation of integration pull requests.
/create_integration_branches Allow the creation of integration branches.
/no_octopus Prevent Wall-E from doing any octopus merge and use multiple consecutive merge instead
/unanimity Change review acceptance criteria from one reviewer at least to all reviewers
/wait Instruct Bert-E not to run until further notice.
Available commands
name description privileged
/help Print Bert-E's manual in the pull request.
/status Print Bert-E's current status in the pull request TBA
/clear Remove all comments from Bert-E from the history TBA
/retry Re-start a fresh build TBA
/build Re-start a fresh build TBA
/force_reset Delete integration branches & pull requests, and restart merge process from the beginning.
/reset Try to remove integration branches unless there are commits on them which do not appear on the source branch.

Status report is not available.

@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Feb 18, 2025

Incorrect fix version

The Fix Version/s in issue BB-481 contains:

  • None

Considering where you are trying to merge, I ignored possible hotfix versions and I expected to find:

  • 9.0.0

Please check the Fix Version/s of BB-481, or the target
branch of this pull request.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 18, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 73.34%. Comparing base (68b9838) to head (403c1be).
Report is 1 commits behind head on development/9.0.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
lib/queuePopulator/KafkaLogReader.js 66.66% <100.00%> (+1.96%) ⬆️
lib/queuePopulator/LogReader.js 80.79% <100.00%> (+0.21%) ⬆️

... and 3 files with indirect coverage changes

Components Coverage Δ
Bucket Notification 75.37% <ø> (ø)
Core Library 80.14% <100.00%> (-0.06%) ⬇️
Ingestion 70.14% <ø> (ø)
Lifecycle 77.08% <ø> (ø)
Oplog Populator 85.06% <ø> (ø)
Replication 58.60% <ø> (ø)
Bucket Scanner 85.60% <ø> (ø)
@@                 Coverage Diff                 @@
##           development/9.0    #2615      +/-   ##
===================================================
- Coverage            73.36%   73.34%   -0.03%     
===================================================
  Files                  201      201              
  Lines                13370    13374       +4     
===================================================
  Hits                  9809     9809              
- Misses                3551     3555       +4     
  Partials                10       10              
Flag Coverage Δ
api:retry 9.48% <0.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
api:routes 9.29% <0.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
bucket-scanner 85.60% <ø> (ø)
ft_test:queuepopulator 10.17% <60.00%> (-0.55%) ⬇️
ingestion 12.56% <40.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️
lib 7.31% <0.00%> (-0.02%) ⬇️
lifecycle 18.75% <0.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
notification 1.06% <0.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
replication 18.53% <0.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
unit 48.56% <100.00%> (+0.07%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

@Kerkesni Kerkesni force-pushed the bugfix/BB-481 branch 4 times, most recently from b669d5f to 817aa29 Compare February 18, 2025 15:15
@francoisferrand
Copy link
Contributor

this includes some old commit & fixups, please rebase on latest and cleanup history.

@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Feb 19, 2025

Incorrect fix version

The Fix Version/s in issue BB-481 contains:

  • None

Considering where you are trying to merge, I ignored possible hotfix versions and I expected to find:

  • 9.0.1

Please check the Fix Version/s of BB-481, or the target
branch of this pull request.

@Kerkesni Kerkesni changed the base branch from development/9.0 to improvement/BB-527 February 19, 2025 08:59
@francoisferrand
Copy link
Contributor

probably the last one for 9.0.1, should bump? Or to you prefer to merge this one after the release?

@Kerkesni Kerkesni force-pushed the bugfix/BB-481 branch 2 times, most recently from f0bb54f to 2dafc97 Compare February 24, 2025 12:48
@Kerkesni Kerkesni force-pushed the improvement/BB-527 branch 2 times, most recently from c3c7dce to 68b9838 Compare March 4, 2025 09:24
Kafka LogReader manages offsets in Kafka itself

Issue: BB-481
@Kerkesni
Copy link
Contributor Author

Kerkesni commented Mar 4, 2025

/approve

Base automatically changed from improvement/BB-527 to development/9.0 March 4, 2025 09:57
@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Mar 4, 2025

I have successfully merged the changeset of this pull request
into targetted development branches:

  • ✔️ development/9.0

The following branches have NOT changed:

  • development/7.10
  • development/7.4
  • development/7.70
  • development/8.6

Please check the status of the associated issue BB-481.

Goodbye kerkesni.

The following options are set: approve

@bert-e bert-e merged commit 403c1be into development/9.0 Mar 4, 2025
10 checks passed
@bert-e bert-e deleted the bugfix/BB-481 branch March 4, 2025 10:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants