Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Introduce StandardSchemaV1 interface in Skunkteam Types #108

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Feb 17, 2025

Conversation

untio11
Copy link
Contributor

@untio11 untio11 commented Feb 12, 2025

Hooked into the existing Valid/Invalid Conversion tests.

Hooked into the existing Valid/Invalid Conversion tests.
@untio11 untio11 force-pushed the robin/introduce-standard-schema branch from ecb6e78 to a1cafb3 Compare February 12, 2025 17:32
@untio11 untio11 force-pushed the robin/introduce-standard-schema branch from b86f597 to 3f73f39 Compare February 13, 2025 08:18
@untio11
Copy link
Contributor Author

untio11 commented Feb 13, 2025

After merging and releasing this PR, open a PR to merge updated StandardSchema readme from our fork upstream.

@untio11 untio11 marked this pull request as ready for review February 13, 2025 08:48
@pavadeli pavadeli self-assigned this Feb 13, 2025
@pavadeli pavadeli self-requested a review February 13, 2025 12:38
Copy link
Member

@pavadeli pavadeli left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Awesome work! I'm suggesting a slightly toned down version of the messages in the issues. If you agree with my changes then you can merge at will.

Note that this will merge into the next branch. After merging this PR, I think it's time to release another major version.

@pavadeli pavadeli merged commit 5887e3c into next Feb 17, 2025
4 checks passed
@pavadeli pavadeli deleted the robin/introduce-standard-schema branch February 17, 2025 11:14
pavadeli added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 18, 2025
* feat: Introduce StandardSchemaV1 interface in Skunkteam Types

Hooked into the existing Valid/Invalid Conversion tests.

* chore: Forgot to run pre-pr command

* suggesting simpler messages in standard validate

---------

Co-authored-by: Paco van der Linden <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants