Added BitNot operation.

[orizi]

This change is 

[spapinistarkware]

Reviewed 5 of 14 files at r1, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: 5 of 14 files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @orizi)

---

crates/cairo-lang-parser/src/lexer.rs line 376 at r1 (raw file):

    LT,
    Not,
    Tilde,

Our token are not named bang, dash, etc... They are baned Not, Minus, after the math operation. If we wanna be consistent, this should be BitNot or BitwiseNot.

[spapinistarkware]

Reviewed 9 of 14 files at r1.
Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @orizi)

[orizi]

Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @spapinistarkware)

---

crates/cairo-lang-parser/src/lexer.rs line 376 at r1 (raw file):

Previously, spapinistarkware (Shahar Papini) wrote…

Our token are not named bang, dash, etc... They are baned Not, Minus, after the math operation. If we wanna be consistent, this should be BitNot or BitwiseNot.

i'm not really sure what is better in this case - do you really think BitNot is clearer?

[spapinistarkware]

Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @spapinistarkware)

crates/cairo-lang-parser/src/lexer.rs line 376 at r1 (raw file):

Previously, spapinistarkware (Shahar Papini) wrote…
i'm not really sure what is better in this case - do you really think BitNot is clearer?

I dunno, but I'd rather be consistent

[orizi]

Reviewable status: 4 of 14 files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @spapinistarkware)

---

crates/cairo-lang-parser/src/lexer.rs line 376 at r1 (raw file):

Previously, spapinistarkware (Shahar Papini) wrote…

I dunno, but I'd rather be consistent

Done.

[spapinistarkware]

Reviewed 10 of 10 files at r2, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @orizi)