Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix #5912 Ambiguity on Access Decision Manager's Strategy #5959

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
+1 −1
Closed

Fix #5912 Ambiguity on Access Decision Manager's Strategy #5959

Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
145b0fb
Changed formulation for affirmative strategy
Dec 5, 2015
e9a7787
Replace '.' with ';'
Dec 5, 2015
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Next Next commit
Changed formulation for affirmative strategy
Pierre Maraitre committed Dec 5, 2015

Verified

This commit was signed with the committer’s verified signature. The key has expired.
sebastienrousseau Sebastien Rousseau
GPG key ID: 3D1BC90288A4203E
Expired
Verified
Learn about vigilant mode
commit 145b0fb5369a2ccb952f40cb64d39edeb0e00202
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion components/security/authorization.rst
View file
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ the votes (either positive, negative or neutral) it has received. It
recognizes several strategies:

``affirmative`` (default)
grant access as soon as any voter returns an affirmative response;
grant access as soon as there is one voter granting access.

``consensus``
grant access if there are more voters granting access than there are denying;