Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🔧 Remove some internal fields from needs layout #1330

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 13, 2024

Conversation

chrisjsewell
Copy link
Member

@chrisjsewell chrisjsewell commented Oct 13, 2024

It should not be necessary to ever show these fields to users on the rendered need

fixes #1329

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 13, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 87.97%. Comparing base (4e10030) to head (6c71160).
Report is 98 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1330      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   86.87%   87.97%   +1.09%     
==========================================
  Files          56       60       +4     
  Lines        6532     7016     +484     
==========================================
+ Hits         5675     6172     +497     
+ Misses        857      844      -13     
Flag Coverage Δ
pytests 87.97% <ø> (+1.09%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@chrisjsewell chrisjsewell merged commit b5ac8ff into master Oct 13, 2024
17 checks passed
@chrisjsewell chrisjsewell deleted the chrisjsewell-patch-2 branch October 13, 2024 16:47
@ramevaf
Copy link

ramevaf commented Oct 21, 2024

Will there be another version released? Using v4 without this fix will be quite annoying I guess 🫠

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

'delete: False' and 'jinja_content: False' shown by default in v4.0.0
3 participants