Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

📚 clarify needimport argument format #1384

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 27, 2025
Merged

Conversation

chrisjsewell
Copy link
Member

@chrisjsewell chrisjsewell commented Jan 22, 2025

Explain the difference between local paths that are; relative to the document, relative to the source directory, absolute

see: https://sphinx-needs--1384.org.readthedocs.build/en/1384/directives/needimport.html

Explain the difference between local paths that are; relative to the document, relative to the source directory, absolute
@chrisjsewell chrisjsewell changed the title 📚 clarify needimport argument format 📚 clarify needimport argument format Jan 22, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 22, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 87.98%. Comparing base (4e10030) to head (3ebdbaa).
Report is 103 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1384      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   86.87%   87.98%   +1.10%     
==========================================
  Files          56       60       +4     
  Lines        6532     7132     +600     
==========================================
+ Hits         5675     6275     +600     
  Misses        857      857              
Flag Coverage Δ
pytests 87.98% <ø> (+1.10%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@ubmarco ubmarco self-requested a review January 27, 2025 09:28
Copy link
Member

@ubmarco ubmarco left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@chrisjsewell chrisjsewell merged commit f5e62bf into master Jan 27, 2025
19 checks passed
@chrisjsewell chrisjsewell deleted the chrisjsewell-patch-2 branch January 27, 2025 09:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants