Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

♻️ Remove back link manipulation from needextend #1386

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 27, 2025

Conversation

chrisjsewell
Copy link
Member

Back links are computed at the end of the need post-processing, after needextend have been applied.

Back links should always be in-sync with forward links, therefore it doesn't make sense to modify back links in this way.

Thankfully, the current availability of back link options in needextend directives is not documented, and so are unlikely to have been actually used.

Back links are computed at the end of the need post-processing, after `needextend` have been applied.

Back links should always be in-sync with forward links,
therefore it doesn't make sense to modify back links in this way.

Thankfully, the current availability of back link options in `needextend` directives is not documented, and so are unlikely to have been actually used.
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 26, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 87.98%. Comparing base (4e10030) to head (5c64426).
Report is 100 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1386      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   86.87%   87.98%   +1.10%     
==========================================
  Files          56       60       +4     
  Lines        6532     7131     +599     
==========================================
+ Hits         5675     6274     +599     
  Misses        857      857              
Flag Coverage Δ
pytests 87.98% <ø> (+1.10%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Member

@ubmarco ubmarco left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for spotting this, LGTM.

@chrisjsewell chrisjsewell merged commit af3c8bf into master Jan 27, 2025
18 checks passed
@chrisjsewell chrisjsewell deleted the remove-extend-backlinks branch January 27, 2025 08:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants