ALFREDAPI-568 Separated upload to native Alfresco webscript as a workaround to broken multipart upload with Alfresco MVC

[todorinskiz]

Fixes https://xenitsupport.jira.com/browse/ALFREDAPI-568

• Is CHANGELOG.md extended?
• Does this PR avoid breaking the API?
  Breaking changes include adding, changing or removing endpoints and/or JSON objects used in requests and responses.
• Are all Alfresco services wired via ServiceRegistry (and not per service)?
• Does the PR comply to REST HTTP result codes policy outlined in the user guide?
• Is error handling done through a method annotated with @ExceptionHandler in the webscript classes?
• Does the PR follow our coding styleguide and other active procedures?
• Is usage of this. prefix avoided?

See README.md for full explanation.

TL;DR

1. Disabled old upload endpoint (Alfresco MVC)
2. Added a new classic Alfresco webscript, incl descriptor and Spring XML bean definition
3. Reused existing code (node info construction and object mapper for noderef and qname serialization)

Reproduce

Fix Share upload for local testing and break Alfresco MVC multipart upload

• Checkout https://github.com/xenit-eu/docker-alfresco/
• Disable https://github.com/xenit-eu/docker-alfresco/blob/master/tomcat-base/tomcat-embedded-10/src/main/java/eu/xenit/alfresco/tomcat/embedded/tomcat/TomcatFactory.java#L135 and build local docker image
• Update build.gradle for the chosen Alfresco version in Alfred API repository

Test fix

curl --location 'http://localhost:8080/alfresco/s/apix/v1/nodes/upload' \
--header 'Content-Type: multipart/form-data' \
--header 'Accept: application/json' \
--header 'Authorization: Basic YWRtaW46YWRtaW4=' \
--form 'parent="workspace://SpacesStore/<target-folder-uuid>"' \
--form 'file=@"your-file.txt"' \
--form 'type="cm:content"' \
--form 'extractMetadata="false"'

[maartenboonen-xenit]

Maybe move configureObjectMapper from SearchNodeJsonParser to this class and call ObjectMapperFactory from SearchNodeJsonParser instead?

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
4 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud