DatadogLogs - Add Device's Brand, Name, and Model in LogEvent

[aldoKelvianto]

What and why?

In the current logging implementation, we haven't automatically include device's brand, name, and model.
It is possible to add it manually by adding device-model in Global Attributes, as mentioned in this doc: https://docs.datadoghq.com/logs/log_collection/ios/?tab=cocoapods#global-attributes
However, as user in #1489 mentioned, it would be nice if the SDK add the device's model automatically.

Resolve #1489

How?

A brief description of implementation details of this PR.

Review checklist

• Feature or bugfix MUST have appropriate tests (unit, integration)
• Make sure each commit and the PR mention the Issue number or JIRA reference
• Add CHANGELOG entry for user facing changes

Custom CI job configuration (optional)

• Run unit tests for Core, RUM, Trace, Logs, CR and WVT
• Run unit tests for Session Replay
• Run integration tests
• Run smoke tests
• Run tests for tools/

[maciejburda]

Thanks for the contribution @aldoKelvianto

Could you please run linter, because it's failing on CI?

You can find more info under Lint section in this doc:
https://github.com/DataDog/dd-sdk-ios/blob/develop/CONTRIBUTING.md#lint

In the meantime I'll try to evaluate validity of your proposal and let you know. We have some internal action plan regarding this, and we need to make sure it's aligned.

[aldoKelvianto]

Could you please run linter, because it's failing on CI?

Thank you so much for sharing the solution, I'll run the linter and try the CI again 🙏

In the meantime I'll try to evaluate validity of your proposal and let you know. We have some internal action plan regarding this, and we need to make sure it's aligned.

Sure thing, thank you!

[maciejburda]

Enabled CI

[ncreated]

@aldoKelvianto great contribution, thank you! I made necessary updates for lint and tests and we will follow with a merge.

@DataDog/rum-mobile-ios All tests are green. CI failed on dependency-manager tests as MacCatalyst build doesn't support fork branches. This is false-positive, I will proceed with elevated permission merge.