connectivity of wedge inclusion #2211
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Alizter
force-pushed
the
ps/rr/connectivity_of_wedge_inclusion
branch
2 times, most recently
from
f0d021b to
c549b35
Compare
Signed-off-by: Ali Caglayan <[email protected]> <!-- ps-id: 2cf5be9b-809a-4e96-86e4-720ce5f02299 -->
Alizter
force-pushed
the
ps/rr/connectivity_of_wedge_inclusion
branch
from
c549b35 to
5000fb0
Compare
|
I will rebase this after #2253. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In this PR we show that the wedge connectivity lemma actually says something about wedges.
We show that the inclusion map from a wedge to a product has the expected connectivity. The wedge connectivity lemma could be adjusted to make it easier to apply, since it was a bit awkward.