Revise Everest storage writing #10302
Open
+236
−159
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
yngve-sk
force-pushed
the
25.03.13.revise-storagewrite
branch
2 times, most recently
from
6786fb8 to
8eb3660
Compare
CodSpeed Performance ReportMerging #10302 will not alter performanceComparing Summary
|
yngve-sk
force-pushed
the
25.03.13.revise-storagewrite
branch
4 times, most recently
from
09557b3 to
317c287
Compare
9 tasks
yngve-sk
force-pushed
the
25.03.13.revise-storagewrite
branch
from
bf56fef to
7b4c98d
Compare
yngve-sk
force-pushed
the
25.03.13.revise-storagewrite
branch
from
7b4c98d to
84ca876
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Issue
Resolves #10235
Approach
Write files instantly, and read them from the file system rather than from in-memory. Should set things up for redirecting some of the dataframe getters to ERT storage.