-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 54
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix/simplify mqtt #578
Fix/simplify mqtt #578
Conversation
9d0040b
to
619c227
Compare
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #578 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 74.84% 74.77% -0.07%
==========================================
Files 288 287 -1
Lines 23932 23900 -32
==========================================
- Hits 17912 17872 -40
- Misses 6020 6028 +8
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Can you add a unit test that yields multiple targets? Maybe after #574 is merged in? |
619c227
to
5437b4a
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also seems something went wrong rebasing.
Co-authored-by: Erik Schamper <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you change the commit message/PR title to something more descriptive?
Simplify MQTT loader to use Loader.find_all().