-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 781
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add new topology for smartswitch #14797
Conversation
@ganglyu can we rename this topo as t1-smartswitch? Please refer a related PR in sonic-net/sonic-buildimage#17326 |
I suggest using t1-8-lag-smartswitch, t1-32-lag-smartswitch, and t1-64-lag-smartswitch as topology names, please let me know what you think. |
seems to be the same work that Jing is doing? PR: #14595 (Please ignore the demo folder). |
@@ -351,3 +351,20 @@ | |||
inv_name: veos_vtb | |||
auto_recover: 'False' | |||
comment: Tests virtual switch vm | |||
|
|||
- conf-name: vms-kvm-smartswitch |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
where is the topology update between NPU to DPU VMs?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I only created VM for NPU and DPU in this PR.
We will have another PR to cover the connection between NPU to DPU VMs.
Need to check with Jing |
Description of PR
Summary:
Fixes # (issue)
Microsoft ADO: 25068545
Type of change
Back port request
Approach
What is the motivation for this PR?
Need new topology to support smartswitch testbed
How did you do it?
Add new topology and related testbed information
How did you verify/test it?
Run add-topo and deploy-mg, check device configuration
Any platform specific information?
Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?
Documentation